P. v. Aguilera
This appeal asks us to decide whether the trial court violated Penal Code section 654 by imposing a term for assault concurrent to a term for robbery based on information contained in the probation report. On appeal after her no contest plea, defendant asserts that the court erred in imposing a concurrent term for the assault when it should be stayed pursuant to section 654. She also contends that the trial court should not have considered the probation report in imposing sentence. For the reasons stated below, Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Aguilera