P. v. Mitchell
Jeremy Robert Mitchell appeals from a judgment imposed after revocation of his probation. His counsel raises no issues and asks this court for an independent review of the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was apprised of his right to file a supplemental brief but did not do so. Defendant was represented by counsel throughout the proceedings. There was no error in the sentencing. This court has reviewed the entire record and there are no meritorious issues to be argued.
Comments on P. v. Mitchell