P. v. Vistro
Ferdinand Pitargue Vistro appeals a judgment after his conviction of first degree murder. (Pen Code, 189/187, subd. (a).) Court conclude: 1) the trial court did not err by admitting statements Vistro made before the murder, 2) it properly admitted statements the victim made before the crime to show her state of mind, and 3) there was no prejudicial prosecutorial misconduct. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Vistro