legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re S.M.
Appellants R.G. (mother) and Sean M. (father) appeal various orders of the juvenile court, which terminated their parental rights as to their daughter S.M. They argue that the juvenile court erred in (1) denying fathers motion to set aside disposition orders that were entered before his status was elevated to that of presumed father, (2) denying mother additional reunification services, (3) terminating parental rights, (4) denying the request of the minors great aunt to place the minor with her, and (5) precluding fathers counsel from questioning a social worker about the financial motive for selecting adoption as the permanent plan for the minor. Court disagree and affirm the orders.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale