In re S.M.
Appellants R.G. (mother) and Sean M. (father) appeal various orders of the juvenile court, which terminated their parental rights as to their daughter S.M. They argue that the juvenile court erred in (1) denying fathers motion to set aside disposition orders that were entered before his status was elevated to that of presumed father, (2) denying mother additional reunification services, (3) terminating parental rights, (4) denying the request of the minors great aunt to place the minor with her, and (5) precluding fathers counsel from questioning a social worker about the financial motive for selecting adoption as the permanent plan for the minor. Court disagree and affirm the orders.
Comments on In re S.M.