legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Clarke
Bryan James Clarke appeals the judgment entered after a jury convicted him on five counts of assault with a firearm (Pen. Code[1], 245, subd. (a)(2)), and one count of making a criminal threat ( 422). The jury also found true the allegations that Clarke personally used a firearm in committing the assaults ( 12022.5, subds. (a)-(d)). Clarke was sentenced to a total state prison term of 17 years 4 months. The charges arise from a car chase ending with Clarke firing shots at the occupants of the other car. Clarke's sole contention on appeal is that the trial court committed prejudicial error by instructing the jury with CALCRIM No. 875, which defines the elements of assault with a firearm. Clarke's attorney requested the instruction. Court conclude that any error was invited, and accordingly affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale