legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Aguilar
Defendant Danny Aguilar was convicted by a jury of nine counts relating to the kidnapping, carjacking, robbery, torture, and shooting of Luis Porras.[1] Defendant received a sentence of life without the possibility of parole on count 1 (kidnapping for reward or extortion), plus an additional 25 years to life under section 12022.53, subdivision (d) (personal use of a firearm resulting in great bodily injury).[2] Defendant contends on appeal that: (1) the exclusion of expert witness testimony on eyewitness identification was an abuse of discretion; (2) the limitation on his cross-examination of the victim violated his constitutional right to present a defense and confront witnesses; (3) his convictions on counts 2 (carjacking) and 3 (kidnapping for carjacking) must be reversed for insufficient evidence that the car was forcibly removed from the victims immediate presence; (4) the court was required to instruct the jury sua sponte to give close scrutiny to the testimony of an accomplice, Andres Barreda, who received a favorable plea agreement; (5) the prosecutor committed prejudicial misconduct; (6) his trial counsel was ineffective; and (7) the cumulative effect of the errors warrants a reversal. Court reject the contentions, modify the judgment, and affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale