P. v. McCaney
Defendant David Wayne McCaney appeals for the second time from his sentence on a burglary conviction. Previously, we remanded the case for the trial court to recalculate defendants presentence custody credits. (People v. McCaney (July 19, 2006, G035932, mod. Aug. 2, 2006) [nonpub. opn.].) Defendant has failed to show the burglary conviction was the sole reason for his loss of liberty during the additional period he contends he is entitled to presentence custody credits. (People v. Johnson (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 1467, 1485.) To the contrary, there is substantial evidence in the appellate record supporting the trial courts finding that there were additional reasons for defendants confinement. The trial court did not err in refusing to grant defendant additional presentence custody credits. Court therefore affirm.
Comments on P. v. McCaney