legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Panther v. Mazzarella
This appeal is the latest chapter in a series of cases in which plaintiff/cross-defendant James P. Panther seeks legal malpractice damages from several of his former attorneys, individually and as law firms, for alleged lost opportunities stemming from the disappointing outcome of certain underlying actions concerning a real estate development project which never came to fruition. (E.g., Panther v. Park (July 16, 2003, D038066 [nonpub. opn.]) (our prior opinion); Panther v. Micheli (May 15, 2007, D048047 [nonpub. opn.]) (our prior Micheli opinion).)
In this case, the trial court granted a motion for summary adjudication filed on behalf of defendants/cross-complainants Mark Mazzarella and Mazzarella, Dunwoody & Caldarelli, LLP (sometimes collectively "MDC") as to the first and second causes of action in Panther's fourth amended complaint ("FAC"). A related ruling was also issued concerning an affirmative defense in Panther's answer to MDC's cross-complaint, and some cross-complaint issues remained for trial. However, summary judgment was entered for the individual defendant Mark Mazzarella only and plaintiff appeals. Court affirm the summary judgment and adjudication.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale