P. v. Teague and Rivera
Defendants appeal after being convicted of two counts of robbery, one count of burglary, and various enhancements and priors arising from a grocery store robbery. Defendant Laura Sue Teague argues that prosecutorial misconduct and judicial bias deprived her of a fair trial. She further argues that two of the conditions of her probation are inappropriate. Defendant Omar Humberto Rivera appeals solely on the grounds that he was improperly sentenced under Penal Code section 654. Court find none of these arguments have merit and therefore affirm.
Comments on P. v. Teague and Rivera