Real Wealth Corp. v. Mazur
Sherman Mazur appeals the denial of his motion to vacate the renewal of a money judgment against him. He claims the renewal is void for lack of jurisdiction and that substantial evidence does not support the trial courts finding that his motion to vacate the renewal was untimely. We conclude the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction by renewing the judgment before the procedural prerequisites for doing so had been met, and that the renewal was voidable by a timely direct attack. Because no substantial evidence was timely presented to the trial court to support the finding that Mazurs motion to vacate was untimely, Court reverse.
Comments on Real Wealth Corp. v. Mazur