In re Roger A.
The minor, Roger A., appeals from the January 11, 2007 wardship order. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 602.) He was placed home on probation. The juvenile court sustained the allegation of a delinquency petition filed December 19, 2006, charging the minor with carjacking. (Pen. Code, 215, subd. (a).) The juvenile court declared the offense a felony and set the minors maximum confinement time at nine years. The minor argues: there was insufficient evidence to sustain the petition; the juvenile court improperly imposed a maximum period of confinement; and probation condition No. 15 was unconstitutionally vague. Court affirm the wardship order with a modification to the challenged probation condition.
Comments on In re Roger A.