legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re J.S.
The District Attorney of Los Angeles County filed a petition alleging that defendant and appellant J.S. (J.) came within the provisions of Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 because he committed misdemeanor vandalism (Pen. Code, 594, subd. (a)) and misdemeanor resisting arrest (Pen. Code, 148, subd. (a)(1)). The juvenile court found the allegations to be true and placed J. on probation under Welfare and Institutions Code section 725, subdivision (a) under various terms and conditions. J. was permitted to remain in his parents home. The juvenile court set a maximum period of physical confinement at one year, four months. On appeal, J. contends that the juvenile court erred in setting a maximum period of physical confinement because he was placed at home on probation and not ordered confined in the California Youth Authority. Court agree and order the one year, four month maximum period of physical confinement stricken from the order placing J. on probation. Court otherwise affirm the order of probation.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale