legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Canfield
Following a contested hearing in which defendant Christopher Canfield was charged with violating the terms of his probation, the trial court revoked his probation and ordered the execution of the previously suspended sentence of three years in state prison. The opening brief filed by defendants appellate counsel raises no issues and asks this court for an independent review pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Defendant has been afforded an opportunity to file a supplemental brief and has not done so. After reviewing the record, Court find no meritorious issues to be briefed or argued and affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale