legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Rolando N.
Cindy appeals a judgment of the juvenile court terminating her parental rights to her minor son, Rolando N., under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. Cindy contends the court erred by denying her section 388 petition for modification seeking either return of Rolando to her care with family maintenance services, or alternatively, for additional services. She also contends the court lacked sufficient evidence to support its finding that the beneficial parent-child relationship exception of section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(A) and sibling relationship exception of section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(E) do not apply to preclude terminating her parental rights. We affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale