legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Mary J. v. Superior Court
Mary J. (Mother) has petitioned this court for extraordinary writ challenging the juvenile courts continued placement of T.F. in foster care rather than with his maternal aunt (Aunt). Mother also seeks to compel the juvenile court to divest the child welfare worker of discretion related to visitation. These rulings were included in the courts order of October 4, 2007, which otherwise terminated Mothers reunification services and set a hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 to select a permanent plan. As discussed post, Court find no error and deny Mothers petition on the merits.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale