legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Marquis
This is an appeal from an order denying Bret Marquis's postjudgment motion that the trial court remove a mandatory sex offender registration requirement from the judgment. After a jury trial, Bret Marquis was found guilty of voluntary oral copulation with a minor age 14 or 15 by a defendant over age 21. (Pen. Code, 288a, subd. (b)(2); see 288.) Pursuant to section 290's mandatory sex offender registration requirement for defendants convicted of certain specified sex offenses, Marquis was ordered to register as a sex offender. ( 290, subd. (a)(1)(A), (2)(A).) He challenged the registration requirement on appeal, arguing that his constitutional right to equal protection of the laws was violated because a defendant convicted of voluntary sexual intercourse with a minor in the same age group was subject only to section 290's discretionary sex offender registration requirement. In an unpublished opinion, Court rejected this challenge. (People v. Marquis (Oct. 18, 2005, D044601) (Marquis I).)

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale