Nadelman v. Paul
Appellant Jeremy Paul individually and doing business as Quickdraw Permit Consulting (Appellant) appeals a judgment holding him liable for design and construction errors in a home improvement project. As to his liability, he argues the trial court erred by finding he breached a duty to supervise construction of the project, engaged in intentional misrepresentation, violated the Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA, Civ. Code, 1750 et seq.), conspired to evade licensing laws, and violated Business and Professions Code section 17200. As to the damages award, he argues the court erred by refusing to apply collateral estoppel to a finding in a default judgment and failed to make appropriate adjustments to the compensatory damages award. Court affirm.
Comments on Nadelman v. Paul