legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re R.B.
H.T. (H.) appeals from judgments terminating parental rights to her children, R.B. (R.) and K.T. (K.), under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. H. asserts the court erred when it did not inquire of K.'s father whether K. is or may be an Indian child under the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), title 25 United States Code section 1901 et seq., as required by California Rules of Court, rule 5.664(d), then rule 1439(d). H. does not raise any issue with respect to R., and Court dismiss the appeal as to R.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale