In re Hamilton S.
Hamilton S. appeals from an order sustaining a petition for modification under Welfare and Institutions Code section 777.[1] He contends that: (1) The juvenile court violated his Sixth Amendment right to confront and cross-examine witnesses, when it permitted his probation officer to testify about what his teacher and his grandmother told the probation officer. (2) There was insufficient evidence that he was in violation of two of the probation conditions. (3) Two of the conditions are unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, so they must be modified to include a knowledge requirement. Court modify the two conditions to include a knowledge requirement, and otherwise affirm.
Comments on In re Hamilton S.