P. v. Chavira
Robert Chavira entered negotiated guilty pleas to receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, 496, subd. (a))[1]and attempting to dissuade a witness ( 136.1, subd. (b)(1)). He admitted a prior serious felony conviction (a strike) ( 667, 1170.12, 668) and serving a prior prison term ( 667.5 subd. (b), 668). The plea agreement included a lid of seven years and Chavira waived the right to have a jury determine whether aggravating facts supported the upper term at sentencing. (Blakely v. Washington (2004) 542 U.S. 296 (Blakely); see Cunningham v. California (2007) 127 S.Ct. 856 (Cunningham).) The record does not include a certificate of probable cause. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.304(b).)
A review of the entire record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436, including the possible issues referred to pursuant to Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issue. Competent counsel has represented Chavira on this appeal.
The judgment is affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Chavira