P. v. Trigueros
Edgardo Trigueros appeals from the judgment of conviction for corporal injury to a cohabitant, assault by means likely to produce great bodily injury, assault with a semiautomatic firearm, making criminal threats, dissuading a witness, and two counts of child abuse. He argues that (1) jury instructions were improper and (2) the court erred in imposing an aggravated term for several of the crimes. Court conclude only his second argument has merit. Court remand the case to the trial court to sentence him in accordance with the requirements of Cunningham v. California (2007) 549 U.S. [127 S.Ct. 856] (Cunningham). In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Trigueros