In re M.S.
Vincent S. (father) appeals from the juvenile courts order on his Welfare and Institutions Code[1]section 388 petition with respect to his daughter, M., declaring him M.s presumed father but denying his request for sole legal and physical custody of her. Father contends the order must be reversed because due diligence was not exercised in attempting to locate him in the early stages of the dependency proceedings, which deprived him of due process. As Court explain, Court find no merit in fathers contention and consequently affirm the order.
Comments on In re M.S.