legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Eagle Broadband v. Mould
The plaintiff brought this lawsuit for defamation and unfair competition after statements were posted about it on an internet message board. These appeals are taken from the trial courts rulings on two related motions: a special motion to strike the plaintiffs complaint as a strategic lawsuit against public participation, brought by two defendants, and a motion to lift the discovery stay, brought by the plaintiff. At issue here is the trial courts grant of the special motion to strike as to one defendant, its denial of the motion as to another defendant, and its refusal to continue the hearing and allow discovery as requested by the plaintiff.
Independently reviewing the rulings on the special motions to strike, we conclude that the trial court should have granted the special motion to strike as to both defendants. As for the courts denial of the plaintiffs discovery motion, we find no abuse of discretion. Based on those conclusions, Court affirm in part and reverse in part.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale