legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Pate
Based upon evidence obtained during the service of search warrants for two residences used by defendant Jeffrey Allen Pate, a jury convicted him of possession of cocaine for sale and receiving stolen property. As to the drug offense, the jury found that defendant was personally armed with a firearm. Following these verdicts, the jury then found that defendant had two prior convictions which constituted strikes.
Sentenced to state prison for a term of 29 years to life, defendant appeals contending (1) the trial court erred in instructing the jury that personally armed means having a firearm available for use, (2) the evidence is insufficient to support the finding he was personally armed, (3) the trial court prejudicially erred by failing to give a unanimity instruction regarding the charge of receiving stolen property, and (4) the court abused its discretion in denying his Romero motion. Court reject each contention.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale