Oviedo v. Rotondo
Defendant John Rotondo appeals from the trial courts order denying his petition to compel arbitration of an alleged breach of contract claim involving a business loan from plaintiff Arthur Oviedo. Rotondo contends that despite the lack of an arbitration provision in the agreement that is the subject of this lawsuit, the court should have ordered arbitration because another agreement between the parties that does contain an arbitration provision is closely connected to the subject agreement. Court disagree and affirm.
Comments on Oviedo v. Rotondo