P. v. Levine
Marc Levine appeals from a judgment convicting him of three counts of grand theft, one count of grand theft from an elder, and one count of conspiracy to defraud another of property. He argues (1) the trial court erred by using an intent to defraud standard rather than an intent to permanently deprive standard when instructing the jury on the offenses of theft by trick and theft by false pretenses, (2) the trial court erred in admitting hearsay evidence, and (3) the evidence was insufficient to support the jury's guilty verdict regarding victim Stephen Ahn. Court find no reversible error and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Levine