P. v. Hanif
Based on an incident in which a deputy sheriff was attacked by a pit bull while placing appellant Raheen Ahmad Hanif under arrest, a jury found appellant guilty of resisting an executive officer (Pen. Code, 69)[1] and assault with a deadly weapon or force likely to produce great bodily injury ( 245, subd. (c)). Appellant now argues insufficient evidence supports the assault conviction and raises two claims of instructional error. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Hanif