P. v. Haydar
Defendant David Allan Hayder was convicted of possessing methamphetamine and being a felon in possession of a firearm. On appeal, he contends he was not a felon at the time he possessed the firearm because his felony convictions had been reduced to misdemeanors and dismissed. Therefore, he asserts, insufficient evidence supported the conviction. Finding merit in defendants contention, Court reverse and remand for resentencing.
Comments on P. v. Haydar