legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Bentley
In two separate cases, Judy Elizabeth Bentley entered negotiated guilty pleas to possession of methamphetamine for sale in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11378 and to one count of forgery of an altered access card in violation of Penal Code section 484i, subdivision (b). As part of the plea bargain, Bentley was to be placed on probation for three years, serve a stipulated term of 365 days in jail and have other pending charges against her dismissed. The trial court sentenced Bentley in accordance with the terms of the plea bargain, but also imposed as a condition of probation that Bentley have no contact with Calvin Delathouwer, her codefendant in the forgery case. At the time of sentencing, Bentley was engaged to marry Delathouwer.
Bentley appeals, contending the no contact condition of probation order was an abuse of discretion and cannot withstand constitutional scrutiny.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale