legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Samuels v. Forest
Plaintiff and appellant Noeman Samuels sued defendant Ira Forest claiming that Forest intentionally interfered with an oral agreement between Samuels and Sohrab and Faramarz Shakib (the "Shakibs") pursuant to which the Shakibs agreed that they would not attempt to purchase the Canyon Center, commercial property located in Santa Clarita (the "Property"), from Forest unless and until they were notified by Samuels that he was unable to reach and consummate a deal to acquire the Property himself.[1]On Forest's demurrer, the trial court ruled that the statute of limitations barred this lawsuit, and that, "Forest, the seller of the property, was not bound by the alleged agreement between plaintiff and defendants Sohrab Shakib and Faramarz Shakib and was privileged to sell his property to whomever he wished." Court conclude that the statute of limitations bars the action, and so affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale