In re Caitlyn L.
R.S. and Andrew L. (together the parents) appeal a judgment of the juvenile court terminating their parental rights to their minor daughter Caitlyn L. under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. The parents challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the court's finding the beneficial parent child relationship exception of section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(A) did not apply to preclude terminating parental rights. They also contend the court erred by denying R.S.'s request for a continuance to complete a bonding study. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on In re Caitlyn L.