Jackson v. Bailey
Patricia Burns Bailey, as Trustee of the Burns Family Trust - 1992 (appellant), appeals from a February 21, 2006 Judgment and from a June 9, 2006 Final Judgment both entered by the San Francisco Superior Court in the underlying action.[1] She contends the trial court erred in (1) determining that an amendment to the trust document was void; (2) rescinding a transaction in which she obtained title to real property that was the primary asset of the trust; (3) removing her as trustee of the trust; and (4) determining that the trusts no contest clause did not prohibit respondents Bernice Burns Jackson (Jackson) and Bravel Burns (hereafter, collectively, respondents) from being named as beneficiaries of the trust. Appellant also claims the trial court erred in issuing the Judgment before issuing a tentative decision and without having provided her the opportunity to request a statement of decision, and that the courts Final Judgment, issued after she filed a notice of appeal to the Judgment, is invalid. Court affirm the Final Judgment as the operative judgment.
Comments on Jackson v. Bailey