legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Bursiaga
A jury convicted defendant Thomas Cesar Bursiaga of first degree murder (Pen. Code, 187, subd. (a); 189)[1]and found true the special circumstance allegation that he discharged a firearm from a motor vehicle with intent to inflict death ( 190.2, subd. (a)(21)). The jury also found true allegations that defendant intentionally and personally discharged a firearm and killed the victim ( 12022.53, subd. (d)), and that he committed the crime for the benefit of a criminal street gang ( 186.22, subd. (b)). Defendant was sentenced to state prison for life without possibility of parole plus a consecutive term of 25 years to life for the firearm discharge enhancement. The gang enhancement was stayed. Among the fines and fees imposed was a $10,000 restitution fine suspended unless parole is revoked. On appeal, defendant contends (1) his mistrial motions were erroneously denied, (2) the firearm discharge enhancement must be stricken because it is effectively a lesser included offense of the special circumstance of murder by discharging a firearm from a motor vehicle with intent to inflict death, and (3) the suspended restitution fine must be stricken; the Attorney General concedes this last point. Court modify the judgment as to the latter point and otherwise affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale