Guerrero v. City of San Diego
Plaintiffs and appellants Pablo Guerrero, Jr. and Sarah Arakawa appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant and respondent City of San Diego (City) on plaintiffs' complaint in which they alleged a roadway constituted a dangerous condition of public property. Plaintiffs contend summary judgment was improper because they presented evidence raising triable issues of fact as to whether (1) City employees negligently or wrongfully created the dangerous condition (2) City had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition; and (3) statutory design immunity applied. Plaintiffs also contend City is estopped from asserting Guerrero's comparative fault on the issues presented. Court affirm.
Comments on Guerrero v. City of San Diego