legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Baez
As stated in our prior opinion, defendant Bernardo Baez was sentenced to prison following a no contest plea to a charge of attempted murder. As part of his sentence, the trial court ordered defendant to pay a restitution fund fine of $2,200. Defendant challenged the courts imposition of that fine on appeal, asserting that it was not part of his plea bargain. We rejected defendants challenge and affirmed the judgment. The California Supreme Court granted review, as the same issue was then pending before it in Crandell. After issuing its decision in Crandell, the Supreme Court transferred this case back to this court, directing us to vacate our prior decision and to reconsider the cause in light of its recent decision. (People v. Baez, S146832, order filed August 13, 2007; see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.528 (d).)
The judgment is affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale