In re Lauren K.
Tanya K. (the mother) and James R. (James or the stepbrother) appeal from an order terminating the mothers parental rights as to Lauren. James argues his petition
under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388[1]asking for further visitation was improperly denied. The mother claims that Orange County Social Services Agency (SSA) never made appropriate inquiries into the Indian heritage of the childs biological father and that the court erred by finding the benefit and sibling exceptions of section 366.26, subdivisions (c)(1)(A) and (c)(1)(E) did not apply. Court find that none of these contentions has merit and affirm the order.
Comments on In re Lauren K.