P. v. Vang
Following his convictions for two counts of first degree murder, two counts of attempted murder committed with deliberation and premeditation, and one count of evading a peace officer with willful and wanton disregard for safety, defendant Xer Vang appeals. He contends there was insufficient evidence that one of the murders was committed with premeditation and deliberation, the trial court erred in admitting unduly prejudicial autopsy photographs, and the trial court erred in sentencing him to the upper term on the conviction for evading a peace officer and imposing that term to run consecutively to his other sentences. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Vang