legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Honer v. Ford Motor Co.
Alleging she had been diagnosed with mesothelioma as a result of her exposure to asbestos, a California resident (since 1956) who had lived in New Jersey until 1951 filed a complaint for damages, asserting a premises liability cause of action against two defendants who owned properties in New Jersey where her father and brother worked with asbestos as employees of an independent contractor hired by the defendants. Among other things, the plaintiff had laundered her fathers and brothers asbestos-covered work clothes in the familys New Jersey home. The trial court granted summary judgment for one defendant (Ford Motor Company) on the ground that the New Jersey statute of repose barred the action and for the other defendant (Merck & Co., Inc.) on the ground that the defendant owed no duty to this plaintiff who had never been to the work site. Because summary judgment was not properly granted as to either defendant, Court reverse and remand with directions.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale