P. v. Allen
Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to prove a violation of section 422. He also contends that the trial court erred in (1) failing to instruct the jury sua sponte on the lesser included offense of attempted criminal threat ( 664, 422); (2) admitting evidence of his bad character; (3) failing to give a limiting instruction; and (4) admitting evidence of the victim's good character. In addition, appellant argues that the prosecutor committed misconduct during closing argument, that the trial court committed judicial misconduct, and that his admission of the prior prison term is invalid. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Allen