legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Santiago O.
The case involves appeals from different orders by Andy O., the mother of minors Santiago, Jesus and Jennifer. First, appellant appeals from the order denying her Welfare and Institutions Code section[1]388 petition as to all three children and contends the juvenile court abused its discretion when it denied her petition after a contested hearing. Three months later, after Santiago was placed with his father, appellant filed a second section 388 petition as to Jesus and Jennifer. Appellant also appeals from the order denying her second petition and terminating her parental rights as to Jesus and Jennifer. Appellant contends the court erred when it denied her second petition without a hearing and when it found the exception to termination in section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(A) did not apply. Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale