Solar Turbines v. Brush HMA
Plaintiff and appellant Solar Turbines (Solar) appeals from a judgment confirming an arbitration award and from the trial courts denial of Solars petition to correct the arbitration award. Solar contends the arbitrators exceeded their powers by not awarding Solar attorney fees despite contractual language requiring the prevailing party to be indemnified for attorney fees. Defendant and appellant Brush HMA (Brush) also appeals the trial court order confirming the arbitration award and claims it is entitled to attorney fees as the prevailing party against Solars petition to correct the arbitration award. For the reasons set forth hereafter, Court conclude the trial court acted correctly and Court therefore affirm the judgment.
Comments on Solar Turbines v. Brush HMA