Parsa v. Caplan
Cyrus Parsa appeals from an order granting summary judgment in favor of Richard H. Caplan in Parsas actions for professional negligence, fraud, and negligence per se. Parsa contends that the trial court erred in 1) finding that Caplan met his summary judgment burden with respect to causation; 2) finding that Parsa failed to present a triable issue of material fact with respect to causation; 3) failing to address Parsas claims for fraud and negligence per se; and 4) sustaining Caplans evidentiary objections. Finding no error, Court affirm.
Comments on Parsa v. Caplan