In re L.P.
E. R., mother of L. P. and L. R., timely appeals from October 27, 2006 and March 9, 2007 orders (1) denying her motion, based on allegedly changed circumstances, to enforce existing conjoint therapy and visitation orders, and terminating visitation; and (2) terminating her parental rights. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 388; 366.21, subd. (h); 366.26; all further undesignated section references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code.) Mother contends the juvenile court erred under In re Hunter S. (2006) 142 Cal.App.4th 1497 by failing to enforce earlier orders for conjoint therapy and visitation and delegating discretion whether and under what circumstances visitation occurred to the children and their therapist. Mother further argues those errors prevented her from showing she maintained beneficial regular visitation and contact with her daughters under section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(A), which if shown may have justified not terminating her parental rights. Court reject these contentions and affirm the orders.
Comments on In re L.P.