legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Marc A.
By writ petition, the mother of a dependent child challenges the findings and orders made by the juvenile court in bypassing reunification services and setting a permanency planning hearing. Asserting that the court misinterpreted and misapplied section 361.5, subdivision (b)(10), the mother contends that she made reasonable efforts during the relevant timeframe to treat the problems that led to the removal of the childs siblings. In any event, she argues, it is in the childs best interests to provide reunification services to her. Finding substantial evidence to support the juvenile courts decision, Court deny the mothers petition.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale