In re Alexis J.
Appellants William J. (father) and Natalie J. (mother) (the parents) appeal the juvenile courts order finding that their daughter, Alexis J., came under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (a). They argue that there was insufficient evidence that Alexis suffered serious physical harm as a result of corporal punishment. The parents also argue that the juvenile court acted in excess of its jurisdiction when it placed the family on probation for a period of nine months, rather than the statutory period of six months. Court affirm.
Comments on In re Alexis J.