legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Zuniga
A jury convicted appellant Carlos Zuniga of second degree robbery (Pen. Code, 211, 212.5, subd. (c)),[1]and found true enhancement allegations that (1) in committing the instant offense, appellant acted for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with, a criminal street gang, with the specific intent to promote, further or assist in criminal conduct by gang members ( 186.22, subd. (b)(1)), and (2) a principal in the commission of the instant offense personally used a firearm ( 12022.53, subd. (e)(1)) The jury acquitted appellant of a second count of second degree robbery. The court imposed a prison term of 23 years, consisting of the three year midterm for the substantive offense, 10 years for the gang enhancement and 10 years, the court erroneously stated, for an enhancement for personal use of a firearm under section 12022.53, subdivision (b). The abstract of judgment reflects the sentence as pronounced by the court.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale