P. v. Arrington
A jury found appellant guilty of first degree burglary. (Pen. Code, 459.) Appellant waived a jury on further allegations that he had twice been previously convicted of first degree burglary, i.e., he had two prior serious felony convictions, and that he had five prior convictions for which he had served prison terms. The court found the prior conviction allegations to be true.
Appellant timely appealed. On appeal, appellant contends that the court committed reversible error by (1) denying his repeated motions for disclosure of the identity of a confidential informant, (2) instructing the jury under CALCRIM Nos. 220 and 224 (Jan. 2006 ed.), and (3) denying a motion to strike one of the prior strike convictions under Romero. Finding no error, Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Arrington