P. v. Pearson
Defendant Oscar Maurice Pearson appeals from a judgment imposing a six-year prison sentence following his conviction by a jury of burglary and related offenses. He asserts four grounds of appeal, two of which are conceded to be correct by the Attorney General and one of which has been conclusively resolved by an intervening decision of our Supreme Court. The remaining issue is whether the trial court prejudicially erred in impaneling a second jury over defendants objection to determine the truth of four prior prison term allegations. Court conclude that it did.
Comments on P. v. Pearson