legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Medina
Appellant and defendant Oscar Medina was convicted by a jury of possessing a controlled substance. He was convicted by the court of two counts of assault with a firearm with gang enhancements. Medina was sentenced to a total term of four years on one of the assault counts, with a four-year sentence on the other assault count and a three-year sentence on the possession count, all ordered to run concurrently. On appeal, he argued: 1) the trial court failed to announce the judgment before imposing sentence and did not make the true findings as to the enhancements; 2) the enhancements should have been stricken according to the terms of the jury waiver; and 3) the sentence violates Blakely v. Washington (2004) 542 U.S. 296 (Blakely). Court previously affirmed the judgment and conviction with instructions to the trial court concerning custody credits; now, on remand from the United States Supreme Court, Court again affirm and remand with instructions.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale