In re C.S.
L.S., father of the minors C.S. and A.S., appeals from an order of the juvenile court terminating his parental rights. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26, 395; unspecified section references that follow are to the Welfare and Institutions Code.) Appellant contends (1) the evidence does not support the juvenile courts finding the minors are adoptable, (2) the juvenile court abused its discretion in finding the beneficial relationship exception ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(A)) does not apply, and (3) [u]nder the circumstances of this case, guardianship is a more appropriate permanent plan than adoption. Court affirm.
Comments on In re C.S.